Gazette E-dition












School levies rejected

Operating levies for Highland Local Schools and Medina City Schools failed Tuesday night, leaving superintendents to emphasize the need
for a change in the way schools are funded.

In Medina, only 5,276 voters approved the 11.7-mill continuous levy; 9,554 were against it, according to unofficial results from the Medina County Board of Elections.

Without the levy, the district predicts a $13 million deficit in 2011 and a $32 million deficit by 2012.

a1-mg-color-4cols-stepp-copy Medina Superintendent Randy Stepp reacts to the news Tuesday night the 11.7-mill incremental operating levy for Medina City Schools failed 9,554 votes to 5,276, according to unofficial results from the Medina County Board of Elections. (Lisa Hlavinka / Gazette)

Medina Superintendent Randy Stepp said the district will have to cut 145 positions, totaling approximately $9.5 million. Pay-to-participate fees at the high school will increase from $100 to $400, and performing arts fees also will rise. Transportation likely will revert to state minimums, which means no busing for high school students and all students who live within two miles of their school, he said.

The incremental levy would have added 3.9 mills a year over three years, generating approximately $4.6 million each of those years toward operating expenses. It would have cost the owner of a $100,000 house $120 the first year, $239 the second year and $359 the third year, Treasurer Wally Gordon has said.

In March 2008, a 6.9-mill levy for operating expenses also failed.
In Highland, the 7.9-mill, continuous operating levy was defeated 4,051 votes to 2,695 votes, according to unofficial results from the Board of Elections.

Superintendent Catherine Auckerman said the district will be forced to “cut several million dollars from our budget prior to the 2010-11 school year.”

The last time Highland voters passed a new levy was in 1998. Since then, Auckerman said the district has seen an increase of 1,000 students, a new high school and elementary school and a reduction in state funding.

“In Highland, 70 percent of our general fund revenue comes from local and 30 percent comes from the state,” Auckerman said. “The district has not replenished the local share of that for 11 years. … We’re literally operating the district on 1998 dollars for a lion’s share of our operating funds.”

The Highland levy would have cost homeowners $248.85 per $100,000 of appraised property valuation, according to the Medina County Auditor’s Office.

Auckerman and Stepp said the levy failures provide evidence that school funding needs to change.

“We’ve been talking in the school district for a long time that the current … industrial-age model for educating isn’t the model of the future, and we have been looking for ways to change the model and do things differently,” Stepp said. “One is to better educate our students; number two is to be more cost-effective.”

Auckerman agreed.

“The funding system in Ohio is predicated on a partnership between the state and local community … although Highland has not asked for new operating money from voters since 1998, other districts are forced to continually return to their local communities, asking for support of tax issues, and the result is ultimately division,” she said.

“What this is going to challenge me to do is get that model in place sooner than later,” Stepp said.

Contact Lisa Hlavinka at (330) 721-4048 or lhlavinka@ohio.net.



Print this story
Report an innappropriate comment



In order to comment, you must agree to our user agreement and discussion guidelines.
Read our user agreement and discussion guidelines ..
Need help? Email Us.

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/suddensammcdowell/ suddensammcdowell

    Welcome to reality Medina City School System, cut the fat and present a realistic levy and the people will listen and respond. Scare tactics are “old School” and represent poor leadership. the school board and Mr. Stepp are out of touch with the people.

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/chipmonkey1/ chipmonkey1

    Let’s face it. We already knew that Medina didn’t have the ready cash BEFORE we even built the new schools….then they try to ram this levy down our throats? Laughable that they thought the people of this county would be so gullible.
    The massive margin in the votes shows that the people of this county are right on the ball and would not be so easily tricked by the bureaucrats…common sense prevailed here.
    Point blank, if you CAN’T afford what you already have, then why would you add more to it? It amazes me how some of you people got your jobs in the first place concidering your total lack of mathematical abitities.

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/4thekids/ 4thekids

    It is truly sad to see the Medina levy fail. I hope those that voted against it at least did so from an informed perspective and researched to see what the school system has done to control costs while maintaining Medina’s coveted Excellent rating. If you took the time to do so, you would see that Medina has done a good job of “trimming the fat” while giving our kids the highest quality education possible in an environment of ever-increasing student population. If however, you didn’t take the time to do so before voting, and just lumped this issue onto the overall “I’m sick of paying taxes” pile, shame on you. Please don’t complain about deterioration of the school rating or declining home values or increases in juvenile crime in the coming years. You reap what you sow, and if investing in our kids now isn’t important enough to you now, then it never will be. Thanks for taking away a major reason why people move to Medina County.

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/jeh69/ jeh69

    Ref: Highland Levy Failure

    Albert Einstein defined insanity as repeating the same behavior over and over and expecting different results.

    In response to Dr Christopher’s remark, “It is beyond my understanding.”

    How can you NOT understand that the property owners don’t like it that you spent more than you collected since 2005? They don’t like your continued salary increases despite not collecting enough revenue to fund them. They don’t like your continued expansion of non-essential programs. They consider these things extravagances that they can’t afford while their salaries and benefits are being cut, they are losing their jobs, and even losing their homes! They don’t think they should have to give you more money so you can continue that strategy.

    Property owners in the Highland district have been very generous for many years. They are already paying 14% more than the constitutional limit! You have abused that generosity.

    Between 2000 and 2009 your revenues increased 49%. So stop telling people you are operating on 1998 funds. It’s not true.

    In response to Dr. Aukerman’s remark, “…back on the ballot in 2011….we will have to ask for more…”

    I have to ask the question: If 7.9 mils failed in November, and 5.9 mils failed in both May and August, what makes you think an even greater levy will pass in 2011?

    Are you both insane?

    Dr. Aukerman, your salary was $122k before your last raise. You are being paid to control costs. Do your job. Control your administrative salaries that exceed $857k.

    85% of your budget is salaries and benefits. Stop telling us that it is for the kids. Reduce that budget.

    We don’t need Orchestra, Strings, Drama, Chinese, etc….we need core curriculum.

    It is your extravagant spending to achieve your Excellence Awards that attracted the 1000 new students. They come with only 36% state funding and you expect property owners to make up the difference. You created a financial monster that continues to grow! It’s your job to control it. It is NOT property owner’s job to bail you out.

    To both Dr’s: property owners will not have more available cash in 2011. They expect you to cut the fat out of your curriculum and reduce the salary and benefits budget. While you may not like it, that should be easy enough to understand. That is what we expect you to do. Until that has been done, you don’t deserve more money.

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/jplower/ jplower

    Perhaps the board will now consider a drive to decertify the union, for it was this dino that has sapped resources and forced policy upon the board, teachers, students and parents for 50 years. The cookie jar is empty. Let us see just how good the unions are, for surely they will offer monetary help in the time of our need. Teachers and school workers should make them accountable and prove to the community that their interests are for the school system, not their political system. Remember, the ohio unions just spent over 500 grand endorsing a politician. What good, teachers, did that do you our your students?

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/medina101/ medina101

    As long as there are teachers unions, I will NEVER vote for a school levy.

    If you ever begin to think that this IS about the children, don’t forget the quote by Albert Shanker, President of the Teachers Union (United Federation of Teachers)

    “When school children start paying union dues, that ‘s when I’ll start representing the interests of school children.”

    It was the truth when he said it, it is the truth now and will be the truth in the future.

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/crystal19985/ crystal19985

    I don’t know what to believe here.The Super says pay to play will increase to $400.Duh!!It’s already $650 to play football,$350 to play basketball!
    In another aspect we needed another school due to crowding.It was bulit,now they need the funds to pay the teachers and buy what they need.
    Don’t you parents want to stop having to rearrange your schedule to drop off and pick up your children.More children will get sick because of those that actually have to walk to school in the cold and wet weather.Then teachers will complain since they aren’t there.
    It’s a catch 22 people we can’t have are cake and eat it too.Either we pass a levy for the schools and pay a little more in taxes or our children will end up suffering(and so do the parents who have to drive).

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/sgrazier/ Steve Grazier

    The story posted here titled “School levies rejected” is actually from Nov. 4, 2009, which is clearly posted at the top of the article. Some recent comments by readers seem to confuse this story with the Wednesday (Nov. 3, 2010) election story titled, “New school levies fail across Medina County.” The link to that article is: http://medinagazette.northcoastnow.com/2010/11/03/new-school-levies-fail-across-medina-county/

    (Flag as Inappropriate)

  • http://northcoastnow.com/members/loutag/ loutag

    The failure of the Medina school levy unfortunately reflects a confluence of regretable situations that make passing property tax levies almost impossible. Some issues are/were totally beyond the school boards control, others not. You may have had a better chance of passing the levy had the teachers contract been negotiated before you ask for additional funds. Also, why would you call back teachers furloughed after the initial concessions when the passage of this levy was in such doubt? Why didn’t the school board hang on to that money saved? Now teachers who were laid off before will once again receive pink slips. And last but not least is the overall state of the economy itself. While some may lament the fact that many are ‘sick of paying taxes’ the fact remains that paying taxes is weighting heavily on many in this city. These are just a few of the factors that doomed the levy.

    (Flag as Inappropriate)